-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix image layer visibility toggle via glue-jupyter #2595
Conversation
which in turn requires a bump to glue-core
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2595 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.53% 91.51% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 161 161
Lines 19602 19596 -6
==========================================
- Hits 17942 17934 -8
- Misses 1660 1662 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Something went wrong ... Please have a look at my logs. It seems that the branch you are trying to backport to does not exist. |
Weird. @meeseeksdev backport to v3.8.x |
…5-on-v3.8.x Backport PR #2595 on branch v3.8.x (fix image layer visibility toggle via glue-jupyter)
Description
This pull request fixes the image layer visibility toggle in plot options by bumping glue-jupyter (glue-viz/glue-jupyter#412), which in turn requires a bump to glue-core, which also removes the need for backwards-compatibility code introduced in #2591 (and future-proofs by calling
stretch_object
instead of instantiating on the fly within the stretch histogram code).Change log entry
CHANGES.rst
? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,list the proposed change log here for review and add to
CHANGES.rst
before merge. If no, maintainershould add a
no-changelog-entry-needed
label.Checklist for package maintainer(s)
This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.
trivial
label.